Hipertensos Tratados e Avaliados por Telemonitoramento Residencial da Pressão Arterial. Estudo TeleMRPA / Treated Hypertensive Patients Assessed by Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring. TeleMRPA Study

Resumo Fundamento: Hipertensos tratados avaliados apenas com a medida casual da pressão arterial (PA) podem estar sujeitos a decisões equivocadas. Objetivos: Avaliar o comportamento da PA pela medida casual e residencial (MRPA), o comportamento das classes de anti-hipertensivos e as prevalências de hipertensão do avental branco (HABNC) e mascarada não-controladas (HMNC). Métodos: Estudo transversal que avaliou pacientes pela plataforma TeleMRPA entre 2017 e 2019. Foram excluídos aqueles sem medicamentos, com 3 ou mais, em uso de espironolactona e alfa-2 agonistas. As variáveis analisadas foram: idade, sexo, índice de massa corporal (IMC), número de medidas válidas da PA, médias da PA sistólica (PAS) e diastólica (PAD) pela medida casual e MRPA, e as classes de anti-hipertensivos. Utilizados os testes t pareado e não pareado e qui-quadrado. Adotado nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Selecionados 22.446 pacientes, dos quais 6.731 preencheram os critérios, sendo 61,3% do sexo feminino, com idade média de 57,8 (±12,6) anos e IMC médio de 29,0 (±5,1) kg/m2. Os valores médios de PAS e PAD foram 6,6 mmHg (p<0,001) e 4,4 mmHg (p<0,001) maiores na medida casual que na MRPA. As taxas de controle da PA foram de 57,0% pela medida casual e 61,3% pela MRPA (p<0,001), com prevalência de HABNC e HMNC de 15,4% e 11,1%, respectivamente. O bloqueio do sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona ocorreu em 74,6% das vezes e 54,8% estavam em monoterapia. Conclusões: O uso da MRPA deve ser considerado no acompanhamento de hipertensos tratados em virtude das elevadas prevalências de HABNC e HMNC. Os anti-hipertensivos tiveram comportamentos distintos nas medidas domiciliares. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Abstract Background: Hypertensive patients undergoing treatment and assessed only by casual blood pressure (BP) measurement may be subject to mistaken decisions. Objective: To assess BP behavior by measuring its levels at the office (casual) and at home (HBPM), the behavior of different classes of antihypertensive drugs, and the prevalence of uncontrolled white-coat hypertension (UCWCH) and uncontrolled masked hypertension (UCMH). Methods: Cross-sectional study assessing patients who underwent BP monitoring in the TeleMRPA platform between 2017 and 2019. The exclusion criteria were: use of no antihypertensive drug; combined use of 3 or more antihypertensive drugs; and use of spironolactone and alpha-2 agonist. The variables analyzed were: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of valid BP measurements, means of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) obtained from HBPM and casual measurement, and the classes of antihypertensive drugs. Paired and unpaired t tests, as well as chi-square test, were used. The 5% significance level was adopted. Results: This study selected 22 446 patients, 6731 of whom met the inclusion criteria [61.3%, female sex; mean age, 57.8 (±12.6) years; mean BMI, 29.0 (±5.1) kg/m2]. Mean SBP and DBP were 6.6 mm Hg (p<0.001) and 4.4 mm Hg (p<0.001) higher in casual measurement than in HBPM. The rates of BP control were 57.0% in casual measurement and 61.3% in HBPM (p<0.001), and the prevalence of UCWCH and UCMH was 15.4% and 11.1%, respectively. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade was observed in 74.6% of the patients, and 54.8% were on single-drug therapy. Conclusions: HBPM should be considered for the follow-up of treated hypertensive patients because of the high prevalence of UCWCH and UCMH. Antihypertensive drugs behaved differently in HBPM. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Hipertensão do avental branco, existe risco cardiovascular? / White coat hypertension, is there any cardiovascular risk?

O diagnóstico, tratamento e acompanhamento da Hipertensão Arterial Sistêmica (HAS) tem como parâmetro principal a medida de consultório, mas, para uma melhor avaliação devemos lançar mão de métodos que permitam maior número de medidas, e que contemplam atenuação das interferências do meio, da situação e do observador. Métodos como a MAPA (Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial) de 24 horas ou as medidas domiciliares da PA, Monitorização Residencial da PA (MRPA) (MAPA 5D) e a Automedida da PA (AMPA), permitem uma caracterização dos fenótipos de pacientes investigados para HAS, permitindo a definição da hipertensão do avental branco (HAB) uma situação com elevação persistente da PA no consultório médico ou clínica, associada a uma pressão nos limites considerados normais em outros ambientes. A HAB foi por muito tempo comparada a um risco cardiovascular semelhante ao da normotensão arterial (NT), entretanto, estudos recentes revelam a existência de um risco cardiovascular (CV) mais acentuado para os pacientes com HAB no acompanhamento a longo prazo. A linha de investigação dos recentes estudos, que na sua quase totalidade são observacionais e metanálises, nos faz aguardar publicações mais robustas, que permitam dirimir duvidas ainda existentes

The diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of Systemic Arterial Hypertension (SAH) has the office measurement as its main parameter, but, for a better assessment, we must use methods that allow a greater number of measures, and with mitigation of the interference of the environment, the situation and the observer. Methods such as 24-hour MAP or household BP measurements, Residential BP Monitoring (MAP 5D) and BP Self-Measurement (AMPA), allow a characterization of the phenotypes of patients investigated for SAH, allowing the definition of white coat hypertension (WCH) a situation with persistent elevation of BP in the doctor's office or clinic, associated with pressure in the limits considered normal in other environments. WCH has long been compared to a cardiovascular risk similar to that of arterial normotension, however, recent studies reveal the existence of a more pronounced CV risk for WCH patients in long-term follow-up. The line of investigation of the recent studies, which are almost entirely observational and meta-analyzes, makes us await more robust publications, which allow us to resolve doubts that still exist

Eventos cardiovasculares y su relación con cambios tensionales / Cardiovascular events and their relation to tension changes

RESUMEN La tensión arterial no es constante, y cambia frecuentemente en respuesta a estímulos fisiológicos de la vida diaria. Se realizó una revisión sistemática en inglés y español de los principales artículos publicados en PubMed, Scielo y MEDLINE durante el periodo comprendido desde el año 2010 hasta 2018, acerca de la variabilidad de la tensión arterial y sus complicaciones. Esto se ha documentado por el uso de la medición ambulatoria de la tensión arterial, una técnica que cada vez está más disponible para medir la tensión arterial y sus variaciones durante el día y la noche, con una frecuencia regular cada 15- 30 minutos a lo largo de un periodo de 24 horas. Esta técnica ha demostrado la diferencia de la tensión arterial en las diferentes mediciones durante el día y la noche, estos cambios en tan corto tiempo son predictores de las complicaciones cardiovasculares independiente de los valores absolutos (AU).

SUMMARY Blood pressure is not constant, and changes frequently in response to the physiological stimuli of everyday living. Was carried out a systematic revision in English and Spanish of the main articles published in PubMed, Scielo and MEDLINE during the period from the year 2010 up to 2018, about the variability of the Blood pressure and his complication. This has been documented by the use of ambulatory Blood pressure monitoring, a technique becoming more widely available that measures Blood pressure at regular intervals-typically each 15-30 min-throughout a 24-h period. This technique has demonstrated that differences among the daylong multiple readings-labelled as short-term variability-are predictive of cardiovascular outcomes independent of absolute Blood pressure levels (AU).

Prevalence of Masked and White-Coat Hypertension in Pre-Hypertensive and Stage 1 Hypertensive patients with the use of TeleMRPA / Prevalência de Hipertensão Mascarada e do Avental Branco em Pré-Hipertensos e Hipertensos Estágio 1 com o uso da TeleMRPA

Abstract Background: The diagnosis of arterial hypertension based on measurements of blood pressure in the office has low accuracy. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in pre-hypertensive and stage 1 hypertensive patients. Method: Retrospective study, of which sample consisted of individuals with BP ≥ 120/80 mmHg and < 160/100 mmHg at the medical office without the use of antihypertensive medication and who underwent exams on the HBPM platform by telemedicine (TeleMRPA) between May 2017 and September 2018. The four-day MRPA protocol was used, with 24 measurements, using automated, validated, calibrated equipment with a memory function. Results: The sample consisted of 1,273 participants, of which 739 (58.1%) were women. The mean age was 52.4 ± 14.9 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 28.4 ± 5.1 kg/m2. The casual BP was higher than the HBPM in 7.6 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 5.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), both with statistical significance (p < 0.001). There were 558 (43.8%) normotensive individuals; 291 (22.9%) with sustained hypertension; 145 (11.4%) with MH and 279 (21.9%) with white-coat hypertension (WCH), with a diagnostic error by casual BP in the total sample in 424 (33.3%) patients. In stage 1 hypertensive individuals, the prevalence of WCH was 48.9%; in prehypertensive patients, the prevalence of MH was 20.6%. Conclusion: MH and WCH have a high prevalence rate in the adult population; however, in prehypertensive or stage 1 hypertensive patients, the prevalence is higher. Out-of-office BP measurements in these subgroups should be performed whenever possible to prevent misdiagnosis.

Resumo Fundamento: O diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial baseado nas medidas do consultório tem baixa acurácia. Objetivo: Avaliar a prevalência de hipertensão mascarada (HM) e do avental branco pela monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) em pacientes pré-hipertensos e hipertensos estágio. Método: Estudo retrospectivo com amostra constituída de indivíduos com pressão arterial (PA) na clínica ≥ 120/80 mmHg e < 160/100 mmHg sem uso de medicação anti-hipertensiva e que realizaram exames na plataforma de MRPA por telemedicina (TeleMRPA) entre maio de 2017 e setembro de 2018. Foi utilizado o protocolo MRPA de quatro dias, com 24 medidas, com equipamentos automáticos, validados, calibrados e com memória. Resultados: A amostra foi constituída de 1.273 participantes, sendo 739 (58,1%) mulheres. A idade média foi 52,4 ± 14,9 anos, índice de massa corporal (IMC) médio 28,4 ± 5,1 kg/m2. A PA casual foi maior que a MRPA em 7,6 mmHg para pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) e 5,2 mmHg para a pressão arterial diastólica (PAD), ambas com significância estatística (p < 0,001). Foram diagnosticados 558 (43,8%) normotensos; 291 (22,9%) hipertensos sustentados; 145 (11,4%) com HM e 279 (21,9%) com hipertensão do avental branco (HAB), com erro diagnóstico pela PA casual na amostra total em 424 (33,3%) pacientes. Em hipertensos estágio 1, a prevalência de HAB foi de 48,9%; nos pré-hipertensos a prevalência de HM foi de 20,6%. Conclusão: HM e HAB têm elevada prevalência na população adulta; entretanto, na população de pré-hipertensos ou hipertensos estágio 1 a prevalência é maior. Medidas da PA fora do consultório, nestes subgrupos, devem ser realizadas sempre que possível para evitar erro diagnóstico.

White-Coat Hypertension: the Neglected Subgroup in Hypertension

The clinical prognostic importance of white coat hypertension (WCH), that is, the clinical condition characterized by an increase of office but a normal ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) is since a long time matter of considerable debate. WCH accounts for a consistent portion of hypertensive patients (up to 30–40%), particularly when hypertension is mild or age is more advanced. Although scanty and inconsistent information is available on the response of office and out-office BP to antihypertensive treatment and the cardiovascular (CV) protection provided by treatment, an increasing body of evidence focusing on the association of WCH with CV risk factors, subclinical cardiac and extra-cardiac organ damage and, more importantly, with CV events indicates that the risk entailed by this condition is intermediate between true normotension and sustained hypertension. This review will address a number of issues concerning WCH with particular attention to prevalence and clinical correlates, relation with subclinical target organ damage and CV morbidity/mortality, therapeutic perspectives. Several topics covered in this review are based on data acquired over the past 20 years by the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study, a longitudinal survey performed by our group on the general population living in the surroundings of Milan area in the north part of Italy.

Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement

Manual blood pressure (BP) recorded in routine clinical practice is relatively inaccurate and associated with higher readings compared to BP measured in research studies in accordance with standardized measurement guidelines. The increase in routine office BP is the result of several factors, especially the presence of office staff, which tends to make patients nervous and also allows for conversation to occur. With the disappearance of the mercury sphygmomanometer because of environmental concerns, there is greater use of oscillometric BP recorders, both in the office setting and elsewhere. Although oscillometric devices may reduce some aspects of observer BP measurement error in the clinical setting, they are still associated with higher BP readings, known as white coat hypertension (for diagnosis) or white coat effect (with treated hypertension). Now that fully automated sphygmomanometers are available which are capable of recording several readings with the patient resting quietly, there is no longer any need to have office staff present when BP is being recorded. Such readings are called automated office blood pressure (AOBP) and they are both more accurate than conventional manual office BP and not associated with the white coat phenomena. AOBP readings are also similar to the awake ambulatory BP and home BP, both of which are relatively good predictors of cardiovascular risk. The available evidence suggests that AOBP should now replace manual or electronic office BP readings when screening patients for hypertension and also after antihypertensive drug therapy is initiated.

The significance of blood pressure variation and metabolic risk factors in patients with different stages of hypertension / 고신대학교의과대학학술지

OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variation (BPV) and metabolic syndrome is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. Ambulatory blood Pressure (ABP) has been shown to be more closely related to cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients than conventional office BP (OBP). Using both OBP and ABP, 4 groups of patients were identified: (1) normotensive patients (NT); (2) white coat hypertensives (WCHT); (3) masked hypertensives (MHT); and (4) sustainedhypertensives (SHT). We investigated the significance of BPV and metabolic risks of these 4 groups. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients between January 2008 and May 2013. Echocardiography and 24 hour ABP monitoring were performed. RESULTS: BMI was significantly higher in the MHT compared with the NT. There were progressive increases in fasting glucose level from NT to WCHT, MHT, and SHT.MHT and SHT had higher 24h and nighttime BPV than NT.MHT was significantly related with BMI (r = 0.139, P = 0.010), creatinine (r = 0.144, P = 0.018), fasting glucose (r = 0.128, P = 0.046), daytime systolic BPV (r = 0.130, P = 0.017), and daytime diastolic BPV (r = 0.130, P = 0.017). Dyslipidemia (r = 0.110, P = 0.043), nighttime systolic BPV (r = 0.241, P < 0.001) and nighttime diastolic BPV (r = 0.143, P = 0.009) shown correlation with SHT. In multivariate logistic regression, MHT was independently associated with Body mass index (OR 1.086, 95% CI 1.005–1.174, P = 0.038) and creatinine (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.010, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: BPV and metabolic risk factors were found to be greater in MHT and SHT compared with NT and WCHT. This suggests that BPV and metabolic risks may contribute to the elevated cardiovascular risk observed in patients with MHT and SHT.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Five Decades of More Light and Less Shadows / Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial: Cinco Décadas de mais Luzes e Menos Sombras

Abstract Casual blood pressure measurements have been extensively questioned over the last five decades. A significant percentage of patients have different blood pressure readings when examined in the office or outside it. For this reason, a change in the paradigm of the best manner to assess blood pressure has been observed. The method that has been most widely used is the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring - ABPM. The method allows recording blood pressure measures in 24 hours and evaluating various parameters such as mean BP, pressure loads, areas under the curve, variations between daytime and nighttime, pulse pressure variability etc. Blood pressure measurements obtained by ABPM are better correlated, for example, with the risks of hypertension. The main indications for ABPM are: suspected white coat hypertension and masked hypertension, evaluation of the efficacy of the antihypertensive therapy in 24 hours, and evaluation of symptoms. There is increasing evidence that the use of ABPM has contributed to the assessment of blood pressure behaviors, establishment of diagnoses, prognosis and the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy. There is no doubt that the study of 24-hour blood pressure behavior and its variations by ABPM has brought more light and less darkness to the field, which justifies the title of this review.

Resumo Nas últimas cinco décadas muito têm sido questionadas as medidas casuais da pressão arterial (PA). Significativa porcentagem de pacientes apresenta PA muito diversa quando examinados na clínica ou fora dela. Por isso, é hoje observada uma mudança de paradigma com relação ao melhor modo de se avaliar a PA. O método que mais se consolidou é a Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial - MAPA. É possível obter-se o registro de medidas de PA durante 24 horas avaliando-se vários parâmetros como: médias de PA, cargas de pressão, áreas sob as curvas, variações entre vigília e sono, variabilidade de pressão de pulso etc. As medidas de PA obtidas pela MAPA são mais bem correlacionadas, por exemplo, com os riscos da hipertensão arterial. As principais indicações para a MAPA são: suspeita de hipertensão do avental branco e da hipertensão mascarada, avaliação da eficácia terapêutica nas 24 horas e avaliação de sintomas. Crescem as evidências de que o emprego da MAPA contribui para avaliar os comportamentos da PA, estabelecer diagnósticos, prognóstico e avaliar a eficácia terapêutica anti-hipertensiva. Sem dúvidas, o estudo do comportamento da PA e suas variações durante as 24 horas pela MAPA nos deixaram com menos sombras e mais luzes, e justifica o título desta revisão.

Higher Blood Pressure Variability in White Coat Hypertension; from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variability (BPV) was recently shown to be a risk factor of stroke. White coat hypertension (WCH) used to be regarded as innocuous, but one long-term follow-up study reported that WCH increased stroke rate compared to normotension (NT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between WCH and BPV. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1398 subjects from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry, who were divided into NT (n=364), masked hypertension (n=122), white coat hypertension (n=254), and sustained hypertension (n=658) groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. The average real variability (ARV), a highly sensitive BPV parameter, was highest in the WCH group, followed by the sustained hypertension, masked hypertension, and NT groups. The results persisted after being adjusted for covariates. The WCH vs. sustained hypertension results (adjusted mean±standard error) were as follows: 24-h systolic ARV, 22.9±0.8 vs. 19.4±0.6; 24-h diastolic ARV, 16.8±0.6 vs. 14.3±0.5; daytime systolic ARV, 21.8±0.8 vs. 16.8±0.6; and daytime diastolic ARV, 16.2±0.6 vs. 13.4±0.5 (p<0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: From the registry data, we found that subjects with WCH or masked hypertension had higher BPV than NT. However, long-term follow-up data assessing the clinical influences of WCH on stroke are needed.

Are BP readings taken after a patient-physician encounter in a real-world clinic scenario the lowest of all the readings in a clinic visit

To determine the difference in Blood Pressure [BP] readings taken before, during and after the clinic encounter. Descriptive study. Cardiology Clinic, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from January to August 2013. Hypertensive and normotensive participants aged >/= 18 years were recruited. Pre-clinic BP was measured by a nurse and in-clinic BP by a physician. After 15 minutes, two post-clinic BP readings were taken at 1 minute interval. All readings were taken using Omron HEM7221-E. Out of 180 participants, males were 57% and 130 [71%] were hypertensive. Mean SBP [Systolic BP] taken preclinic, in-clinic, post-clinic 1 and post-clinic 2 were: 126 +/- 20 mmHg, 131 +/- 23 mmHg, 126 +/- 20 mmHg and 121 +/- 21 mmHg respectively [p < 0.001]. Mean DBP [Diastolic BP] taken pre-clinic, in-clinic, post-clinic 1 and post-clinic 2 were 77 +/- 12 mmHg, 81 +/- 13 mmHg, 79 +/- 12 mmHg and 79 +/- 11 mmHg respectively [p < 0.001]. BP taken in the post-clinic setting may significantly be the lowest reading in a clinic encounter, making in-clinic BP unreliable to diagnose or manage hypertension

Discordance between ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure according to global cardiovascular risk group

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The detection of white coat hypertension (WCH), treated normalized hypertension, and masked hypertension (MH) is important to improve the effectiveness of hypertension management. However, whether global cardiovascular risk (GCR) profile has any effect on the discordance between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and clinic blood pressure (CBP) is unknown. METHODS: Data from 1,916 subjects, taken from the Korean Multicenter Registry for ABP monitoring, were grouped according to diagnostic and therapeutic thresholds for CBP and ABP (140/90 and 135/85 mmHg, respectively). GCR was assessed using European Society of Hypertension 2007 guidelines. RESULTS: The mean subject age was 54.1 ± 14.9 years, and 48.9% of patients were female. The discordancy rate between ABP and CBP in the untreated and treated patients was 32.5% and 26.5%, respectively (p = 0.02). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension and MH was 14.4% and 16.0%, respectively. Discordance between ABP and CBP was lower in the very high added-risk group compared to the moderate added-risk group (odds ratio [OR], 0.649; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.487 to 0.863; p = 0.003). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension was also lower in the very high added-risk group (OR, 0.451; 95% CI, 0.311 to 0.655). CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between ABP and CBP was observed more frequently in untreated subjects than in treated subjects, and less frequently in the very high added-risk group, which was due mainly to the lower prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension.

Como tratamos hipertensão na criança e no adolescente / How we treat hypertension in children and adolescents

Os autores destacam a importância do diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial na infância e na adolescência, a classificação da pressão arterial (PA) e as medidas não medicamentosas e medicamentosas preconizadas para a abordagem da PA nessa faixa etária. A instituição precoce de medidas de intervenção sobre a PA é defundamental importância para a prevenção primária das doenças cardiovasculares.

The authors emphasize the importance of diagnosing hypertension in childhood and adolescence, together with blood pressure (BP) classification and pharmacological and non-pharmacological recommendations for controlling BP in this age group. The early adoption of BP interventions is of fundamental importance for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

The Impact of Different Anthropometric Measures on Sustained Normotension, White Coat Hypertension, Masked Hypertension, and Sustained Hypertension in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND: Many studies have aimed to determine whether body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), or waist to hip ratio (WHR) best predicts hypertension in diabetic patients, with conflicting results. However, no study has examined the specific relationship between these anthropometric parameters with sustained normotension (SNT), white coat hypertension (WCHT), masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) based on office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements in these patients. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes underwent the following procedures: history taking, measurements of anthropometric parameters, office and ambulatory BP measurements, physical examination, laboratory analysis, and random and 24-hour urine analysis. RESULTS: In total, there were 65 dippers and 37 nondipper patients. None of the anthropometric parameters were different between the dippers and the nondippers. There were 25 patients with SNT, 32 with WCHT, seven with MHT, and 38 with SHT. A comparison of anthropometric parameters between these four groups of patients showed that WC (P=0.016) and WHR (P=0.015) were different among all groups. According to regression analysis, only BMI was independently related with MHT (odds ratio [OR], 1.373, P=0.022), whereas only WC has been associated with SHT (OR, 1.321, P=0.041). CONCLUSION: Among anthropometric parameters, only WC and WHR were different in SNT, WCHT, MHT, and SHT in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes.

Atuação da enfermeira eleva o controle de hipertensos e diminui o efeito do avental branco / Nursing actions increases the control of hypertensive patients and reduces white-coat effect / La práctica de la enfermera aumenta el control de los pacientes hipertensos y reduce el efecto de bata blanca

Realizou-se estudo comparativo randomizado para avaliar o controle de hipertensos, com uso da medida residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) e medida casual, bem como para analisar o efeito do avental branco. Hipertensos atendidos em unidades básicas de saúde foram divididos aleatoriamente em: grupo I, participante das atividades educativas, e grupo II, que seguiu a rotina de atendimento. Os hipertensos do grupo I realizaram MRPA no início e final do estudo. Efeito do avental branco foi avaliado pela diferença entre a medida casual e MRPA. Foram incluídos 290 hipertensos, porém realizaram MRPA 82 hipertensos. Houve aumento no controle da pressão do início ao final do estudo nos hipertensos do grupo I (p < 0,05) avaliado pela MRPA (60% para 68,3%) e pela medida casual (62% para 71%); no grupo II o controle foi maior na MRPA do que na medida casual (63% vs 50%). O efeito do avental branco foi maior no grupo II.

A randomized comparative study was performed to evaluate the control of hypertension with use of home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) and casual blood pressure measurement, and analyze the white coat effect. Hypertensive patients in primary health care units were randomly divided into two groups: group I, participating of the educational activities and group II that followed the routine treatment. The hypertensive patients from group I realized HBPM at the beginning and the end of the study. White-coat effect was evaluated by the difference between the casual blood pressure measurement and HBPM. The study included 290 hypertensive patients, but realized HBPM 82 hypertensive patients. There was increase in blood pressure control from the beginning to end of study in hypertensive patients from group I (p < 0.05) measured by HBP (60% to 68.3%) and casual measurement (62% to 71%) and in group II, HMBP hypertension control was higher than the casual blood pressure measurement (63% vs 50%). The white coat effect was greater in hipertensive patients from group II.

Un estudio comparativo aleatorizado se realizó para evaluar el control de la hipertensión con el uso de la medición de la presión arterial en el hogar y la medición ocasional de la presión arterial, y analizar el efecto de bata blanca. Los pacientes hipertensos en las unidades de atención primaria de salud fueron divididos aleatoriamente en dos grupos: grupo I, participando de las actividades educativas y el grupo II que siguieron el tratamiento de rutina. Los pacientes hipertensos del grupo I se dio cuenta de medición de la presión arterial en el hogar en el comienzo y el final del estudio. Blanco-capa efecto fue evaluado por la diferencia entre la medición de la presión arterial casual y medición de la presión arterial en el hogar. El estudio incluyó a 290 pacientes hipertensos, pero se dio cuenta de la medición de la presión arterial en el hogar 82 pacientes hipertensos. Hubo un aumento en el control de la presión arterial desde el principio hasta el final del estudio en los pacientes hipertensos del grupo I (p <0,05) medida por la medición de la presión arterial en el hogar (60% a 68,3%) y la medición ocasional (62% a 71%) y en el grupo II, el control de la hipertensión con el uso de la medición de la presión arterial en el hogar fue superior a la medición de la presión arterial ocasional (63% vs 50%). El efecto de bata blanca fue mayor en los pacientes hipertensos del grupo II.

A monitorização residencial da pressão arterial e o controle de um grupo de hipertensos / Home blood pressure monitoring and control in a group of hypertensive patients / Monitoreo residencial de la presión arterial y control de un grupo de hipertensos

Comparar a medida de consultório com a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA), avaliar o controle da pressão e caracterizar o efeito do avental branco. Pesquisa de campo, quantitativa com 71 hipertensos. A medida da pressão em consultório foi feita pela enfermeira. A monitorização residencial da pressão arterial foi realizada durante 7 dias. O efeito do avental branco foi quantificado para diferenças entre a medida de consultório e a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial nas faixas 1 a 5, 6 a 10 e > 10 mmHg. A medida da pressão de consultório foi significativamente maior (p<0,05) do que a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial. O controle da pressão foi 9,9% na medida de consultório e 23,9% na MRPA. O efeito do avental branco > 10 mmHg para a sistólica foi 57,7% e para a diastólica, 32,4%, na faixa de 6 a 10 mmHg. A medida da pressão em casa avaliou melhor o controle dos hipertensos.

This qualitative study was performed with 71 hypertensive patients, with the objectives to compare outpatient and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), to assess blood pressure control, and characterize white-coat hypertension. A nurse performed the outpatient blood pressure measurement. The home blood pressure monitoring was carried out over seven days. White-coat hypertension was quantified as a difference between the outpatient measurement and home blood pressure monitoring in the ranges from 1 to 5, 6 to 10 and > 10 mmHg. The outpatient blood pressure measurement was significantly higher (p<0.05) than the home blood pressure measurement. Pressure control corresponded to 9.9% in the outpatient measurement and 23.9% in the home blood pressure measurement. The white-coat effect > 10 mmHg was 57.7% for systolic and 32.4% for diastolic pressure, in the range from 6 to 10 mmHg. Home blood pressure measurement provided a better assessment of hypertensive patients' control.

Comparación de la medición en consultorio con el monitoreo residencial de la presión arterial (MRPA), evaluación del control de presión y caracterización del efecto del delantal blanco. Investigación de campo, cuantitativa, con 71 hipertensos. La medición de presión en consultorio fue realizada por la enfermera. El MRPA se efectuó durante siete días. El efecto del delantal blanco se cuantificó para diferencias entre la medición de consultorio y el MRPA en las fajas 1-5, 6-10 y >10mmHg. La medición de presión en consultorio fue significativamente mayor (p<0,05) que el monitoreo residencial de presión arterial. La presión se mantuvo bajo control en el 9,9% de la medición de consultorio y 23,9% de la MRPA. El efecto del delantal blanco >10 mmHg para la sistólica fue de 57,7% y para la diastólica, 32,4%, en la faja 6-10 mmHg. La medición de presión domiciliaria evaluó mejor el control de los hipertensos.

Prevalência da hipertensão arterial, avaliada pela medida casual e monitorização residencial da pressão arterial, em comunidades Adventistas do Sétimo Dia no sudoeste paulista / Arterial hypertension prevalence, assessed through casual measurement and home blood pressure monitoring, in Seventh Day Adventist communities in Southeastern São Paulo

Introdução A hipertensão arterial é influenciada por hábitos e estilos de vida e populações específicas como os Adventistas o Sétimo Dia são orientados a incorporar em suas práticas religiosas, hábitos e estilos de vida saudáveis. O objetivo principal desse estudo foi comparar a prevalência da hipertensão arterial em comunidades Adventistas do Sétimo Dia com comunidade não Adventista. Casuística e Métodos O estudo foi realizado na região sudoeste do estado de São Paulo com 547 pessoas (304 Adventistas e 243 não Adventistas). A pressão arterial foi medida com aparelho automático validado e de acordo com as VI Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão. A religiosidade foi avaliada pela Escala de Duke-DUREL; hábitos alimentares identificados pelo Questionário de Frequência Alimentar; apoio social pela escala de apoio social; consumo de bebida alcoólica pelo Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - AUDIT e transtornos mentais comuns pelo Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ 20). Foi adotado nível de significância de p<0,05. Resultados A maioria era do sexo feminino, idade de 41,5 anos, etnia branca. A prevalência de hipertensão foi menor nos Adventistas (p,0,05) dos não Adventistas, respectivamente, em relação a: escolaridade média (39,8% vs 36,9%), ocupação autônoma (33,6% vs 14,8%), com companheiro(a) (72,4% vs 64,2%), casa própria (66,1% vs 65%), renda individual entre um e três salários mínimos (97% vs 90,9%), homens com menor índice de massa corporal (25.03 ±3,09 Kg/m2 vs 26,97 ± 4,8 Kgm2) e menor circunferência abdominal (90,53±11,63 cm vs 97,19±12,69 cm), mais indivíduos ovolactovegetarianos e vegetarianos (20% vs 0,8%), não fumantes (85,5% vs 67,4%), maior tempo de abandono do tabagismo (14 anos vs 7 anos), praticantes de atividades físicas regulares (47,2% vs 25,8%), abstêmios de bebida alcoólica (100% vs 52,4%).No conhecimento sobre hipertensão os Adventistas se diferiram (p<0,05) dos não Adventistas, respectivamente, por: saberem menos que o tratamento da pressão alta pode evitar infarto (15,4% vs 12%) e problemas renais (58,2% vs 50,9%), reconhecerem que o exercício físico é importante para o controle da pressão (96,1% vs 89,3%), que jovens podem ter pressão alta (84,5% vs 77,8%), que é possível fazer alguma coisa para evitar a pressão alta (90,1% vs 83,1%), entretanto, reconhecem menos o papel da hereditariedade na hipertensão (59,5% vs 71,6%) e os valores de hipertensão (76,3% vs 86,4%). Pelo SRQ20 as mulheres Adventistas referiram mais sintomas que os homens Adventistas (p<0,05, 25% vs 15,3%). Os Adventistas mostraram níveis mais elevados em todas as dimensões da religiosidade e do apoio social (87 pontos vs 83 pontos). Na alimentação os Adventistas foram diferentes (p<0,05) dos não Adventistas, respectivamente, por: consumirem mais frutas e hortaliças (56,3% vs 39%); menos refrigerantes e suco artificial (33,2% vs 19,9%) e menos carne com gordura visível (72,7% vs 39,8%). Os hipertensos Adventistas foram estatisticamente diferentes dos não Adventistas, respectivamente, em relação a: escolaridade média (36,8% vs 15,5%); autônomos e do lar (30,8% e 30,8% vs 15,1% e 19,8%); alimentação vegetariana/ovolactovegetariana (19,2% vs 0%); prática regular de atividade física (49,4% vs 18,8%); tabagismo (0% vs 15,1%); etilismo (0% vs 39,2%), hipertensão referida (74,4% vs 84,3%); uso de medicamento anti-hipertensivo (58,3% vs 66,2%); acredita que a pressão alta tem cura (57,7% vs 32,6%), não acarreta problema renal (71,4% vs 51,3%) e não tem influência da hereditariedade (84,9% vs 66,7%); ausência de diabetes (91% vs 77,9%); usa outros tratamentos para hipertensão (51,8% vs 27,3%); e deixa de tomar remédio "por conta própria" (50% vs 29%).Em relação à presença de transtornos mentais comuns os hipertensos Adventistas referiram menos (p<0,05): ideia de acabar com a vida, sentir-se sem préstimo ou inútil, sentir-se incapaz de desempenhar um papel útil na vida, ter dificuldade no serviço e sentir-se cansado o tempo todo. Na avaliação da religiosidade e de apoio social os hipertensos Adventistas apresentaram níveis mais elevados. Não houve diferença no controle da pressão arterial entre os hipertensos Adventistas (44,8%) e não adventistas (58,9%), porém, os não Adventistas controlados sabiam há mais tempo ser hipertensos (p<0,05, 5 anos vs 3 anos). Os Adventistas apresentaram maior controle pela MRPA quando comparado à medida casual (77,1% vs 44,8%). O efeito do avental branco esteve presente em 12% dos Adventistas, a hipertensão do avental branco em 24,2% e a hipertensão mascarada em 12%. Conclusão: A hipertensão foi menos prevalente entre os Adventistas, o que pode estar relacionado a hábitos e estilos de vida um pouco mais saudáveis apregoados pela religião, embora os índices encontrados estejam bem próximos aos dados de muitos estudos de base populacional. O fenômeno do avental branco encontrou-se bem próximo do estimado na população geral.

Clinical Significance of Home Blood Pressure and Its Possible Practical Application

This review represents the clinical significance of home blood pressure (BP) and its possible practical application. Home BP is highly reproducible and its reproducibility is better than ambulatory BP. According to this feature home BP has a greater prognostic value at least than clinic BP and is extremely effective for the evaluation of drug effects and their duration. The introduction of home BP to the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension facilitates long-term BP control. Home BP is particularly important for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, children and renal diseases. Home BP measurements improve the adherence to medications and medical consultations, and are indispensable for diagnosis of white coat hypertension and masked hypertension. Such efficiency of home BP improves medical economy. Home BP can detect minimal charge in BP mediated by medication, and intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli and detect long-term change in BP. Thus, home BP is now indispensable for improvement in the management of hypertension in medical practice as well as for the recognition of hypertension in the general population. Standardization of the measurement procedure may elevate the position of home BP in the practice of diagnosing and treating hypertension.